Mass Extinction
Extinction outpaces evolution
Extinctions are
currently outpacing the capacity for new species to evolve, according
to Simon Stuart, chair of the Species Survival Commission for the
International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
"Measuring the rate at which new species evolve is difficult, but
there's no question that the current extinction rates are faster,"
Stuart told the Guardian. .
He added that E.O, Wilsons' estimate that the extinction rate could
rise to 10,000 times the background rate would likely prove prescient.
National parks in India and Nepal hit by rhino poachers
The rare Indian rhinoceros is not safe from poachers even in national parks.
In Nepal's world renowned Royal Chitwan National Park, twenty-four Indian rhinos (Rhinoceros unicornis)
have been poached since the last census was taken in 2008. The most
recent one was killed last Thursday. Approximately 372 Indian rhinos
survive in the park, and the population is in decline.
Why we are failing orangutans
It is no secret that
orangutans are threatened with extinction because their rain forests
are being destroyed at an alarming rate. Ten years ago, Shawn Thompson,
a writer, former journalist and university professor, set out to
chronicle the threat to orangutans in a book released in March 2010.
The book is called The Intimate Ape: Orangutans and the Secret Life of a Vanishing Species.
The book spends most of the time talking about the nature of orangutans
and the relationships between orangutans and people. But the ultimate
underlying message is there about the source of the peril to orangutans
and the solution. Thompson says that the problem of saving orangutans
has to do with communications and human nature.
AN INTERVIEW WITH SHAWN THOMPSON
Mongabay: Why do you say the problem has to do with communications and human nature?
Shawn Thompson: We
already have more than enough information to know what the problem is
and how to save orangutans. But the information stays locked within a
relatively small group, mainly scientists and environmentalists, who
are a kind of small subculture on the planet. This group tries to
communicate by being very sensible and rational, but the message
doesn’t get across. The general population doesn’t realize what
orangutans are and that they are much closer to extinction than
gorillas and chimpanzees. The scientists and environmentalists
communicate how they know best, in a sensible and rational way, as
though they are talking to their own subculture. But they are talking
across cultural lines to a mass audience, which listens and behaves in
a different way. So I wrote the book to try and break through that. I
went back to basic issues that move a popular mass audience and tried
to write a book that would appeal to hearts and minds, to have people
fall in love with orangutans, which then becomes the “reason” for
saving orangutans, the incentive. We need to feel that orangutans are
part of our family. And, of course, in terms of evolution and genetics
they are.
Mongabay: Where does human nature come in?
Shawn Thompson:
It will be hard to save orangutan because it goes against the nature of
how a large group of people behaves. We are not talking about
individuals, but mass behaviour. That is something I understand from my
years as a journalist. The mass of people don’t think about orangutans
and the rain forest when they are trying to save money in a grocery
store or buy a piece of furniture or fight a war or get married and
raise children, all of which is part of our biological programming. You
can change individual behaviour, but changing mass behaviour is very
radical and you need to make deep rooted changes to do that. It can’t
be superficial.
Another aspect of human nature, sad to say, is how fragmented
scientists and environmentalists are. They fight among themselves and
lose sight of the big picture. I saw that a lot writing my book and I
see that in the university where I work. People behave too much like
chimpanzees. It would be a better world if people behaved more like
orangutans. I am joking, of course, but only partly. There is some
truth in the jest.
Mongabay: So how do we save orangutans?
Shawn Thompson: To save orangutans, you have to save the
rain forest. As the rain forest goes, so go orangutans. That’s my
mantra. Save our kindred, save our primate family and you save
everything else. The scientists and the environmentalists know that.
The habitat of orangutans is being destroyed in Borneo and Sumatra by
the palm oil plantations primarily, and also by logging for timber and
pulp and paper. That message is clear and simple. Spending a lot more
words on that is obviously not having a strong enough effect, although
that’s not a reason for not continuing to promote the message. Recently
Unilever, the giant producer of consumer goods and the world’s biggest
buyer of palm oil, announced that it would stop buying palm oil from a supplier exposed in a BBC documentary.
The supplier was collecting palm oil used for Unilever soap and
margarine. So we can all feel a little leaner and cleaner over that.
And we want to use positive reinforcement and support the ethical
companies. Unilever previously stopped buying palm oil from the largest
producer in Indonesia. So that’s good. That’s progress. Before that, in
2008, Unilever announced that all Unilever’s palm oil will be certified
sustainable by 2015 and that the company supports the call for an
immediate moratorium on any more deforestation in Indonesia for palm
oil plantations. But there is still so far to go.
Plus, if we want to save
orangutans, we have to evolve morally as a species, another huge task.
I’m not sure we are advanced enough morally as a species to save
another species. It can’t just be a few dedicated souls. It has to be
an act of the mass of humanity. We have to change our basic attitude on
the planet. And that’s a huge task. Ultimately we can’t legislate the
survival of a species or force it on own species. Our species has to
find the will and desire in itself.
Meanwhile, orangutans plunge onward toward extinction. That’s
disheartening
Mongabay: Is the situation with orangutans discouraging? Are there hopeful developments?
Shawn Thompson: I
knew it was pretty hopeless for orangutans when I started the book. It
doesn’t get better, but you feel encouraged being with people who have
a fighting spirit. If you have to spend your last hours on the planet
with anyone, that’s the kind of people you want to be with – at least
for me. It is thrilling to be around a Willie Smits or a Lone
Droscher-Nielsen. I often asked the people working with orangutans why
they were so committed to such a quixotic task. It didn't seem to deter
them. They are that kind of people. And I am that way too. I think that
orangutans are doomed but that you should still work your darnedest to
save them, no matter what. That’s the message I got from Ian Singleton
in Sumatra when we talked about it. I think that’s the idealistic
streak in me and in the people I talked to as well. I must be some kind
of a cynical optimistic, if there is such a thing.
I think the human spirit of the people who care about
orangutans is wonderful and, even if it is a long shot, I am cheering
them on and I hope that comes across in the book. I didn’t think a
gloomy message would do any good, but I also didn’t think the message
should hide the critical situation. I hope the book catches the spirit
of those fighting for orangutans and giving orangutans the best chance
to survive against depressing odds. I guess I want to live in a bit of
an idealistic world where we have a chance of saving orangutans despite
the terrible reality of the situation.
Mongabay: How do we address the situation and take political and environmental action?
Shawn Thompson: I think it’s important to be practical about
how we apply influence and where we apply it to take political and
environmental action. I don’t think the salvation of orangutans and the
rain forest will ultimately come from the West. Activists and consumers
in the West are still crucial and we still need the initiatives, such
as clear labeling of products using palm oil, the sustainability
certification process of organizations like the Rainforest Alliance and
land conservation in Borneo and Sumatra coming from organizations like
the Orangutan Conservancy and the Orangutan Land Trust. We need to
encourage producers to use sustainable practices by buying their
products instead of just attacking and punishing the offenders. We want
to use positive reinforcement as consumers. Positive initiatives from
the West are important, as is diplomacy from the West.
But I think that
salvation for orangutans has to come from the East, from Indonesia,
which in spite of fighting a bitter colonial war against the Dutch
still respects westerners, if not always western politicians. So, in
the West, we need to support and help nurture a made-in-Indonesia
solution, with an eye on consumerism in India and China as a huge
market for products from Indonesia that are affecting the rain forest.
And I suspect that will come from women in Indonesia, especially the
new generation of young women, as it is in other parts of the world, in
the West too. It will come out of the deep values of women and their
sensibility, although we men will also help. I got a sense of
conviction about this last summer as I traveled through Indonesia
talking to politicians and activists there.
I think it is typical of the situation that my book will
probably strike a chord with women between the ages of 15 and 25 and
women in their 50s like me. I will do my male best by writing a book
and trying to inspire people, but it is my girlfriend Wendy and women
like her who will save orangutans. Look at Lone Droscher-Nielsen and
Michelle Desilets and so on. Even on Facebook I notice that I am
connecting more with women than men on this issue and I notice how the
women speak a different language about orangutans than men, although
men like my friend Gary Shapiro stand out and I find it thrilling to
listen to Gary talk about his “adopted daughter” the orangutan
Princess, who he taught sign language in the jungle in the late 1970s.
Gary is fearless in getting sentimental about orangutans and yet he has
an empirical streak that I don’t quite understand. I don’t get how he
integrates those elements, but he does and functions well in a crazy
world. But then he is also married to an Indonesian woman, Inggriani,
so maybe that explains it.
Lone Droscher-Nielsen in
particular is someone we want to watch. I think she has the potential
to emerge as an important global leader in the fight for orangutans, if
she doesn’t burn out first and bear the weight too much of endless
individual orangutans needing endless help and shrinking forests and
the desperate need to raise funds. I wish she could fight the fight
without having to worry about funding. Lone needs our support. I’d like
to write a biography of Lone, which the world needs, but I don’t think
she is ready for that yet. I think women in the West need to support
women in the East. That would be a powerful alliance to save orangutans
and the rain forest. That might work. Those women need to connect and
get organized together.
I didn’t get this political in my book. I didn’t write a
political book about orangutans because I thought we needed to win a
large, mainstream audience for orangutans first. I thought that should
be my role as a writer, although now that the book is written I’d like
to be more vocal about want needs to be done, if that will help.
Mongabay: Why are orangutans so special for you?
Shawn Thompson: I think I empathize more with orangutans
than gorillas and chimpanzees because I understand better their
solitary, introspective side, unlike the more social gorillas and
chimpanzees. You need a solitary, intuitive side to be a strong writer,
which creates a clash with other things you need to be a writer. With
orangutans – who would make good writers, by the way – I like their
quiet, thoughtful, feeling nature. If you use your eyes in a gentle
way, you feel like you are having a conversation with them. If you slow
down and enjoy the sensuality and joy of the natural world, you feel
like you are in touch with them. That’s not scientific, of course, but
then orangutans aren’t studying science. They don’t have to justify
themselves that way. They are living in the world we think we have to
study. I also like the people who like orangutans and they made
orangutans special for me. They were my guides, my gurus.
I started to notice the
intimacy that a few privileged people had with orangutans and I liked
that sense of an intimate relationship you could have with a member of
another species. I really got that watching Willie Smits and Lone
Droscher-Nielsen with young orphan orangutans at the Nyaru Menteng
facility in Kalimantan, Borneo, and the vet Rosa Garriga in Pasir
Pajang. There was a very special moment for me when Willie took my son
Pearce and me at night into a dormitory for young orangutans and we
watched them sleeping. I saw how much that moved Willie and it moved me
too. It was a combination of watching Willie being moved and feeling
moved myself and watching orangutans asleep. There is a real sweetness
and tenderness in being allowed into that protected space of another
living, sentient being asleep and lost in dreams. I have that with my
girlfriend Wendy too. I also enjoyed sleeping on the deck of a boat on
a river in the jungle and feeling that I was under the stars of
orangutans and breathing the air of their trees and the fresh plumes of
their stardust. My son was with me then too.
It is not just about experiencing orangutans. It is about sharing the
experience, like Willie did with me, like I did with my son, like I
hope to do with others with my book. I meant the word “intimate” in the
title of the book on many different levels.
Mongabay: What’s next for you?
Shawn Thompson: I
want to continue writing about wild animals. Before the orangutan book,
I wrote a book about federal prisoners in Canada and the United States,
from my time as a prison reporter. And before that I wrote a travel
guide. I’d love to write another book about the great apes, but there
are too many people better equipped to write about gorillas,
chimpanzees and bonobos than me. I was all set a couple of years to
head off to the Congo to write about bonobos, but the funding from my
university fell through at the last minute, and a lot of it is about
having the time and funding to write these books. The publishers can’t
finance them. But, if my orangutan book catches on, then I will have a
mandate to continue to write about wild animals and their problems, and
that is such a satisfying mission to have. I can live with that
mission.
Half the planet's primates 'threatened with extinction'
In total, close to half of the planet's 634 known primate species
are to some degree threatened with dying out, according to research by
the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and other
conservation and research groups.
That percentage has risen quickly - only three years ago the IUCN put the ratio of vulnerable primates at one third.
"Primates are among the most endangered of all vertebrate groups," said Russell Mittermeier, head of the IUCN's primate specialist group.
Of the top 25, five are on the island of Madagascar, six on the African continent, three in South America and 11 in Southeast Asia.
Mass Extinction Underway, Majority of Biologists Say
A majority of the nation's biologists are convinced that a "mass extinction"
of plants and animals is underway that poses a major threat to humans in the
next century, yet most Americans are only dimly aware of the problem, a poll
says.
The rapid disappearance of species was ranked as one of the planet's gravest
environmental worries, surpassing pollution, global warming and the thinning
of the ozone layer, according to the survey of 400 scientists commissioned by
New York's American Museum of Natural History.
The poll's release yesterday comes on the heels of a groundbreaking study of
plant diversity that concluded than at least one in eight known plant species
is threatened with extinction. Although scientists are divided over the specific
numbers, many believe that the rate of loss is greater now than at any time
in history.









